Tamil Discussion archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [WMASTERS] Re: Old Orthography, response to Kalyan
George has succinctlly addressed this.
Just so I'm clear on this (off-the-encoding-not-glyph-topic) issue, a
At 09:06 AM 9/16/97 -0400, Harold F. Schiffman wrote:
>As those of us who were at the Tamilnet 97 conference in Singapore saw,
>Sri Lanka Tamils do not necessarily follow the so-called new orthography,
>nor are they required by international law or whatever to do so. I think
>Tamils in India and elsewhere need to be aware of the tremendous feelings
>of being jerked around that SL Tamils often feel, and the executive
>decision by TN government to abandon the ORNL's may be one of them.
>Fortunately because it was only a
>> small change to the Tamil character set, it has become universally
Hal - can you help me pin this down some more. Okay it is not universal in
the 100% sense and no language will ever be unless we have a Shih Huang Ti
:-) But what do you think its acceptedness is? i.e. - choose a best guess
between 0 and 99.99 to denote what you mean by "NOT".
Re: Sri Lanka - what's your call on the bottom line - is the Tamil media
there using new or old? Can you be specific? I know that in both Malaysia
and Singapore all newspapers and school textbooks are in "new" form.
I'm ccing this note to a Colombo-based Tamil.Net participant - we'll get
his concrete observations too.
Note for Naren, Colombo: Naren - with regards to the usage of the old or
new Tamil characters for nai, rai and lai in Sri Lanka - can you confirm
which is more prevalent ( consider Tamil newspapers, textbooks, other
written material) - old or new? Please provide specific concrete
bala pillai* firstname.lastname@example.org*the asia pacific internet co, sydney
V I R T U A L C O M M U N I T Y E X P E R T S
<http://apic.net> <http://sydney2000.net> <http://malaysia.net>
<http://tamil.net> for info send blank <mailto:email@example.com>
ph:+61 2 9419 5333 fax: + 61 2 9419 5155
Main Index |