Tamil Discussion archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [WMASTERS] Re: Unanswered Questions!
Pl. read further:
Muthu Nedumaran (Ezil) wrote:
> ________Stuff Deleted________
> > 4. Encoding "Ksha" as a character.
> > ANS: If it is there in the Table, and as far as we dont need those
> > positions, they can be there. Technically we are not losing
> > anything.
> > But personally what I feel is(And I hope its generally logical
> > too!), A language need not have a redundant/unnecessary
> > **character** in its character list. By having it in our
> > we are encouraging the people to use it as a separate
> > But actually it is just a style of writing combined letters.
> > We are not losing any **sound** by leaving it.
> Sorry Nagu, I do not think I'm qualified to do an analysis on ksha. It's
> OK for me both ways. Having it there appears easier to me and I do not
> see any ambiguity ;-)
> >Things To Do List:
> I'm skipping this...for now.
> ~ MUTHU
OK. I understand that there is no **technical** problem there. May be
this thread is not the place to discuss about this problem. So, for our
STANDARDIZATION effort I give the GREEN signal with "Ksha" :-)
Main Index |